221. Why Elect Biden and NOT Trump

2 Nov

For a number of years, I have been writing blogs about Trump. The election is tomorrow and I feel that I still might have some effect on voters that are undecided. The following is a brief discussion of my main points.

Most serious, Trump has a bad Covid-19 record. Starting with the main virus onset in April 2020, he has a consistently discouraged the use of masks and other safety measures. Medical scientists, such as Dr. Fauci have disagreed with Trump, and they have proven to be correct.

Scientists are 99% in agreement on climate change, but Trump ignores this. Briefly, the dangers are major floods, more serious hurricanes, droughts, and worse fires. These are already well documented. Also, 67% of Americans (Pew Survey) want to work on this problem.

Trump withdrew from the Iran Nuclear deal, promising a better deal. He could NOT make a better deal, and now there is less control over the Iran nuclear threat. His efforts regarding North Korea missiles, have failed.

Biden clearly wants to help the people, Trump clearly wants to favor himself and his rich friends. Look at Trump speeches. They are mostly about his needs, not the needs of the people.

Trump constantly lies. For example, he says Democrats want to increase taxes, but in fact, ONLY want to increase them for the very rich. He lies about this and many other things. He loves to brag about his successes, but the statements are mostly false. For example, he is NOT the greatest supporter of Black rights since President Lincoln — there is President LBJ, and others.

Repubs and Trump have claimed to have a health care plan, but after numerous promises over many years, there is no documented (written) plan. Repubs simply cannot agree on a plan, yet want to abolish Obamacare, which provides coverage for “pre-existing conditions” and many other rules helpful for people. Trump would take insurance coverage away from millions of citizens, and but for McCain, almost did.

Newspapers like the Wash, Post and NY-Times, and many others have many decades of reliable and honest reporting. Suddenly, when Trump arrives, they are all “fake” news? He started out with lies about Obama’s birth certificate, and exaggerated threats about immigration at our southern border. He lies about the dangers of covid-19, and is responsible for numerous deaths. Robert Woodward has published recordings of these lies.

Biden stands for reasonable and responsible government. Trump clearly wants to be the King, with total power. He has expressed his love for dictators and has undermined most of our policing and intelligence agencies. He caused our Post Office to be sabotaged, to help with his election. He appoints loyalists rather than experts in many areas. He uses the US Attorney General as his personal lawyer.

Trumps foreign policies are erratic and dangerous. Foreign leaders no longer trust him. Under Obama we had great relationships with other democratic countries. Trump has favored autocracies (dictatorships). His policies with regard to China were costly and ineffective, because he would not work as a team, with our allies. He has lied that foreign countries pay his tariffs, when they are actually paid by US importers, causing
increased prices for us. Because of our policy with China, we are now spending huge amounts of money to help devastated US farmers.

Trump was impeached. Many of his associates and staff are convicted criminals. His turnover of personnel is huge. Many past employees, and even his niece and sister, are highly critical. A Secretary of State (Tillerson) called him a “moron.” There is a huge list of traditional Republicans that have turned against him (example: George Will). A number of traditional apolitical organizations have decided to support Biden over Trump, example: Scientific American (magazine).

Biden, on the other hand, is incredibly experienced and reliable. He will hire the best experts and does not need loyalists, like Trump needs for protection. Biden will not govern by whim and tweets, but will work using a consensus of well qualified advisors. Trump has attacked scientists and others dedicated to truth. He has fired and limited the reports of government scientists.

Summary, Biden will provide our country with responsible leadership and care for the people (all of us). Trump will fail with the virus, international leadership, infrastructure, unbiased justice, world respect, survivable wages for workers, and in other ways.

220. Are the Newer Problems in the US, Unique?

17 Oct

When I think about the current problems facing the USA, it seems that they are worse than anything we have experienced in the past. I have been thinking a lot about this and here is my analysis.

Current Problems. I list three as most disturbing and involving large portions of the population. I fear that some current problems may be very long lasting.

The virus, covid-19 is unique for the modern world. In the past few decades, we have never had such a serious disease. It is highly infectious and has already killed 220,000 of our citizens, and many more world-wide. It has severely disrupted and damaged many lives.

Climate-Change. The current status is certainly a unique and a serious problem. Although we have known about this for decades, we had never in the past been so close to the point of no return, that is, where the effects become almost permanent. Scientists generally list the following more serious effects: floods, forest fires, worse hurricanes, and draughts. Many of these will cause mass migrations, which ultimately cause panic, riots, and maybe even wars.

President Trump is unique in US history. He has made 20,000 lies or extreme exaggerations, recorded by the Washington Post. To be brief, we can list: undermining US government agencies, takeover of the Dept. of Justice, calling 90 percent of our news media fake, ignoring and worsening the pandemic, alienating allies, threatening political rivals with arrest, and many other errors. He was impeached. (See my previous blogs).

Past US Problems. My list below is based on my personal impressions, having lived a long time. Others might make a different list.

Two world wars, WWI and WWII, come to mind. The second one ended in 1945. These were very serious and stand out in history. I could also mention Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afganistan, and Kuwait as important but lesser wars.

McCarthyism. According to Google: “a vociferous campaign against alleged communists in the US government and other institutions carried out under Senator Joseph McCarthy in the period 1950–54.” I was alive at that time and remember that for many outstanding citizens it was a disaster. It could be compared to “Trumpism,” which I think is far worse.

President Nixon. This president caused some serious national problems, but nothing compared to the Trump era. He was forced to resign for his role in the Watergate crime.

Epidemics in the Last 100 years. Here is a very complete list of world-wide epidemics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics I lived through many of these diseases and nothing was as serious and wide-spread as the covid-19. Other serious diseases that stand out in my mind are: AIDs, Ebola, cholera, bubonic-plague, malaria, measles, and smallpox. Note: the bubonic plague has a long history and has recurred from time to time for many years — even in the last 20 years.

Conclusions. After writing the above, I still believe that the problems of today have had a more profound effect on our citizens than anything that happened in the past. The virus has affected all of us: deaths, masks, quarantines, isolations, restaurants closed, bankruptcies, evictions, limited travel, etc. Depending on your location, climate-change effects can be lethal and what is worse, will gradually become more disastrous. And Trump presents serious governmental problems, which have never been experienced in our entire US history. So to answer the question in my blog title, YES, the newer problems in the US, are unique. And if you have the courage to think about it, many of today’s problems could last for many years. But, here is a positive thought. I truly believe that all of our current problems have good solutions, but can only be solved by our most sincere and intelligent, global efforts.

219. Republican Senator Critisizes Trump

16 Oct

I found a complete transcript of Senator Ben Sasse phone-call regarding Trump. It is a long statement so I have extracted the important parts. When a quote is negative, I have included any associated positive remarks, to be fair. This phone call, of course, is very significant, because currently, it is rare for any Republican holding high office to make such criticisms. The full transcript is available from the REV.COM blog, with the URL:

http://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/ben-sasse-phone-call-transcript-criticizing-donald-trump (October 15, 2020)

Here are my selected quotations and some comments. (Quotations are in blue (as written, not corrected), my emphasized remarks are in red.)

In the beginning, he states Donald Trump is our president now, so I’ve worked hard to develop a good relationship with him, he’s got a hard job.” Also: “there are definitely places where we agree.” “I think he’s done some stuff well and some poorly.”

The following quotes are concerned with foreign policy. “Kisses dictators butts,” “He ignores that the Uighurs are in literal concentration camps” (in China), and has not helped the people of Hong Kong. Fails to lead our allies” and “regularly sells out our allies.“When all of our allies from the Pacific have sided with China because Trump’s isolationism was so weak, that our allies begin to doubt, for the first time since WWII, whether they can trust in US strength, and US will, and US courage, and US virtue and values.”

More quotations on different topics: “the way he treats women and spends like a drunken sailor.”he mocks evangelicals behind closed doors.“treated the presidency like a business opportunity.” “Nebraskans, they don’t really want more rage tweeting as a new form of entertainment.” Trump won the 2016 election because “Hillary was unpopular.” (My note, actually, Hillary won the popular vote.)

. TRUMP REFUSED TO TREAT THE VIRUS SERIOUSLY

Re the covid-19 virus: “at the beginning of the COVID crisis, he refused to treat it seriously for months, he treated it like a news cycle, by news cycle PR crisis rather than a multi-year public health challenge, which is what it is.

He remarked that covid-10 it is not “Donald Trump’s fault. But continues “that he careened from curb to curb. First he ignored COVID, and then he went into full economic shutdown mode. He was the one who said, 10 to 14 days of shutdown would fix this. And that was always wrong. I mean, and so I don’t think the way he’s lead through COVID has been reasonable, or responsible, or right.”

Regarding the Senate: “I’m now looking at the possibility of a Republican bloodbath in the Senate. And that’s why I’ve never been on the Trump Train. It’s why I didn’t agree to serve on his reelection committee, and it’s why I’m not campaigning for him.”

A summary for this blog, in the actual words of Ben Sasse is: What the heck were any of us thinking that selling a TV-obsessed, narcicisstic individual to the American people was a good idea?”

218. Science: Its Nature and Early History

11 Oct

Science plays an ever increasing role in global politics and government. It is the basis for climate-change, defeating pandemics and many other diseases, energy use, GMO foods, and many types of manufacturing. So when I saw the book review noted below, I decided to explore its topic.

Michael Strevens wrote a book called “The Knowledge Machine.” A detailed review can be found in The NY Times, October 7, 2020, by Jennifer Szalai. I am not writing a book review. I am writing a blog about the nature of science and responding to some ideas in the book review.

Modern science began its development in the 17th Century. Strevens, in his book presents reasons why it did not develop earlier. Here is one of the main arguments. Science involves long, tedious, and boring measurements and observations, that often are unfruitful. Strevens says that this kind of endeavor is irrational and inhuman. It is argued that for this reason modern science developed slowly. No one wanted to do a lot of boring work.

While there may be some truth to this, we should consider other factors. First, much of scientific work involves processes that are not boring. Spending time in exotic locations like rain forests is fun for many people. Second, spending a few years doing boring work can have the huge rewards of outstanding publications, high salaries, Nobel prizes, powerful academic positions, and a lot of admiration. Many women (or men) are attracted to highly intelligent and successful scientists and professors.

It is not just science that involves some tedious work leading to great rewards. Great paintings can take months of tedious artistic work, but seeing the final picture and showing it in exhibitions is very satisfying. Many of the more artistic and literary professions have tremendous rewards.

Second, it is the nature of science to be progressive. The long delays in the development of modern science depended upon some difficult discoveries. The early growth of science a few centuries ago, depended on some technical factors. One early factor is good communications systems. The advance of science involves the cooperation of many people, and these people must have communication methods like newspapers, for example, which depended on the invention of the printing press. The early ability for people to gather together for the rational discussion of issues was also important. I imagine that many centuries ago, long before the beginnings of modern science, people made some important observations, there was no way to properly communicate these ideas.

Early inventions of certain tools were important in developing scientific topics. For example, it took many years to develop useful glass structures like lenses. These could be used for telescopes, and microscopes. The discovery of electricity was extremely important. Having tools like these allowed for amazing discoveries and stimulated interest in many areas of research.

Final thoughts. First, I want to clarify that Strevens does recognize the value of science. I believe that his main concern is why it started so slowly. I have tried to show that the establishment of key societal structures, and inventions, such as telescopes, microscopes, and electricity were necessary before modern science could take off. The slow development of these necessary factors is understandable. We can also point to the fact that many promising early societies were overrun by powerful, violent armies, like those responsible for the fall of the Roman Empire. The development of science was also slowed by leaders that believed in rigid, traditional dogma.

217. Kamala Harris Wins Debate

8 Oct

Kamla Harris did a terrific job and won the Vice-President debate on October 7, 2020. She had good affect, clear speech, and mostly answered questions appropriately. She interrupted very little and followed the debate rules. When Pence interrupted during her allotted time, she would politely say something like, “I am speaking now.”

On the other hand, Pence was a boring speaker and had great difficulty with the rules. He often ran well over his time limit and ignored the pleas of the moderator. Like Trump, he often interrupted when he heard something he did not like. He totally ignored a question on transfer of power if Biden is elected. What would he do if Trump did not leave office? On the other hand, Pence interrupted frequently and kept speaking after his time was up. I am sure Trump was proud of him because he is the perfect yes-man. He avoided answering a question of about transfer of power if Biden is elected. Trump indicated that if he loses the vote count, he will cause a lot of trouble by raising legal complaints, and who knows what else. He is against mail-in ballots even though everyone in the White House votes that way and it is common in many states.

Although Kamala’s answers were very good, I felt, at several points, that she overlooked some powerful arguments. Below are a list of these factors, which are more like supplemental info than a criticism.

There was a lot of discussion on covid-19. Perhaps the clearest error that Trump made was to discourage the use of masks. He actually ridiculed Biden for wearing a large face mask. Except for one or two brief instances, he ridiculed masks for the entire period when the virus was active: from March to present (October). She could also have mentioned that Trumps lack of a mask on many occasions set a bad example.

Regarding trade policies, one serious Trump failure is with US soy farmers. They were very dependent on China for soy sales and China terminated these sales. Farmers were devastated and Trump had to provide them with large subsidies, paid for from our taxes.

She could have mentioned that Trump successes in unemployment numbers and market upward trends were just continuations of the eight years of the Obama Presidency. Obama started with a very poor economy and made a remarkable recovery over his eight years.

Re global warming, Pence noted that the number of hurricanes stayed pretty much the same, but she could have said that the strength of them has steadily increased with the warmer waters, and destruction has worsened.

There is a tendency for Republicans to blame Biden for problems during the Obama administration. The simple fact is that Vice Presidents have little effect on major policies, which are controlled mostly by Congress and somewhat by the President at that time.

I don’t think that Kamila explicitly stated that there is NO Republican health insurance plan, that is documented in any way and available for examination. This is a continuing and important point.

There is a lot more that could have been said about Trumps anti-science attitudes. He has replaced directly or indirectly many skilled scientists in many areas of government, and has influenced the alteration of their reports to match his political goals.

The nature of protestors could have been made more explicit. Actual protestors tend to be non-violent. When there are demonstrations, certain anarchists from all over the country, may join in and use the opportunity to commit violent crimes. They, in fact, have a negative effect on the goals of those trying to demonstrate.

Trump policy has always been non-cooperative. There is much conflict because he attacks, even the mildest of critics, with vicious name calling and invalid accusations.

These are the thoughts that I had during the debate. Kamalas performance was excellent, and to cover every applicable argument would be impossible for anyone. Although, in the past, I have had some negative feelings about her, I am very happy to say that now my feelings about her are very positive. During the debate, Kamala Harris was very likable, and appropriately controlled — a great choice for Veep.

216. Covid-19 and Outdoor Infection

4 Oct

About four days ago,  Trump had a White-House Rose Garden event introducing his Supreme Court nominee. This was attended by many top administration officials and other prominent people. Shortly afterwards, several attendees tested positive for the virus, including the President and his wife. Where they were infected, is still uncertain, but it could have been in the Rose Garden. Note, it is often assumed that because an event is held outside, it is safe.

However, just being OUTSIDE is not always SAFE. On the average, it is a little better than indoor events. But if people are close together and there is no wind, then virus droplets can spread dangerously. Even with distancing, if a small wind is in the right direction, DROPLETS COULD MOVE A FEW YARDS and cause infection. The basic rule is always: distancing PLUS wearing a good mask. To make good decisions, you must imagine people spewing out droplets, and where they might end up given the wind conditions. Trump was a good distance from his Rose Garden audience, but a mass of virus droplets could travel towards him if a small wind was blowing in his direction.

Officials concerned with impressions and election results, cannot be trusted to make good safety decisions. It is just a matter of common sense, and the rule, that if you are near others, anywhere, then good protective masks are needed. And those wearing masks, for greatest safety, should have masks that are protective for themselves, as well as for others. The President needs to encourage masks and not make fun of others that are following established safety rules. It also would be of great benefit, if our government developed inexpensive masks that protect the wearer, and distributed them in some way at low or no cost.

215. Trump Tax and Finances

30 Sep

ADDED on Oct. 9, 2020. The NY Times documents additional tax factors not discussed below. Also, consider testimony re taxes by Michael Cohen, Trumps lawyer. Alleged is that property values were altered to lower taxes. Oct. 9, 2020

It seems that some popular commentators do not understand how to interpret the latest information on Trumps tax and finances. I have run two small businesses and have had some of the same tax features as the President. However, there is one important difference between me and Trump, my businesses were profitable, I paid substantial taxes, and I was a very cautious investor. Many years ago, I had some investment losses, so I understand how losses can be carried forward.

First, I will try to clarify the tax concept of “carryover.” According to Investopedia, “A tax loss carryforward (or carryover) is a provision that allows a taxpayer to carry over a tax loss to future years to offset a profit.For example: Say you had a $50,000 loss this year due to the virus. There are limitations to applying this loss to this year’s Federal tax return. Next year, you make a profit of 120,000. Your tax basis (income minus expenses) for next year will be 120,000 less some loss carryover from this year. A carryover could erase all of your tax burden for next year, and up to seven future years for the IRS.

It appears that Trump has had several periods of major losses. He began his casino investments around 1984 with a property opened as Harrah’s at Trump Plaza. He ended up with four casinos, all of which went bankrupt. His TV show, The Apprendice ran from 2004 to 2017. He made a good profit from the shows, but invested much of it in golf courses, which mostly lost money. These major losses could be carried forward so that current taxable profits could be substantially reduced.

According to the NY Times (Buettner, Craig, and McINtire, Sept 27, 2020) in several recent years, Trump paid $750 in Federal income tax, and in many other previous years, no tax at all. There are two likely reasons for these low taxes. One would be major net losses for each year, or the second, a carryover of major losses from previous years (or both).

Assuming that Trumps tax reporting is accurate, one must conclude that overall, his finances were NOT profitable. Good, legitament profits generally require high tax payments. Also reported, is that in the next few years, major loans will be coming due.

The financial picture for Trump appears to be some good profits, that are offset by massive foolish investments. He apparently lied about his financial condition, giving the impression that he was a billionaire. After several promises, he never made public his tax returns and stated that they could not be released during an IRS audit. This was not true as there is no such rule. To be fair, it is true to his gross income was often very high, but in fact, his expenses were even higher, resulting in massive debts.

If the voters knew of his financial condition (very substantial debts and poor management) he would never have been elected. Furthermore, if he were properly vetted, he would not have been able to hold major public office. Persons with massive debts, are subject to blackmail and other negative influences. We could speculate that his unusual relationships with Russia and Turkey, could be explained by financial arrangements with these countries. There is much unknown and much to be investigated. But it is very clear, that his major debts and numerous international financial entanglements could influence decisions benefiting himself and not the nation. Also, he never fully disengaged from his businesses when he became President. That is a requirement of the office. His son-in-law also seems to have some similar financial problems.

Conclusion. Although Trump lives a wealthy life, he is NOT a good business man and not a wealthy person. So far, he has been very lucky, considering the many shady dealings he likely engaged in. His greatest skill is certain types of communication, which helped him develop a base of devoted supporters. His weakest area is a failure to study and properly address major challenges.

214. Reversals by Prominent Republicans

25 Sep

A growing number of traditional and well-known Republicans have left the party and/or are now supporting Joe Biden for President. The Lincoln Project is a group formed by such individuals. The following is a list of persons making such a reversal.

George Will: highly respected conservative author and commentators

Bill Kristol:  Frequent commentator on several networks, and writer

Joe Scarborogh: Former US Representative and “Morning Joe” show.

Michael Steele: Former Republican Party Chairman

Cindy McCain: Wife of Senator John McCain, Presidential candidate

John Bolton: Former US ambassador to the UN, and book author

James Comey: Former director of the FBI

Steve Schmidt: Former Republican campaign strategist

Nicolle Wallace: Former Republican W. H. communications director

Justin Amash: US Congressman (Michigan district)

Rick Snyder: Former Michigan Governor

Tom Nichols: Professor of National Security Affairs, Repub consultant

Bill Weld: Former Governor of Massachusetts 

George Conway: Prominent attorney, husband of Kellyanne C.

Andy McKean: US Congress (from Iowa)

Peter Wehner: Aide to three Republican administrations

Joe Walsh: Former US Representative (Illinois)

Max Boot: Prominent columnist for Washington Post

Olivia Troye: Member of Trump administration and Pence aide

And others.

213. Re Virus: Expert Timely Action Was Needed

22 Sep

If our current president had acted early and thoughtfully, many lives lost to covid-19 could have been saved. Nations that worked very seriously on virus control had very few cases and deaths. Below, is a list of significant US actions and inactivity.  Our President was a businessman, with many business failures, and no government or medical experience.  How could he be expected to deal effectively with an extremely complicated issue like a major pandemic. 

The Global Health Security and Biodefense Unit was established by
President Obama in 2015 to deal effectively with problems such as viruses, like covid-19. Apparently, with little consultation and analysis, Trump abolished this unit. Just imagine how different our response to the danger could have been if this unit was in effect and Trump followed its recommendations. 

Trump failed to make early preparations for fighting this virus. Instead, he told everyone not to be concerned and the virus would soon be gone. The US could have been working on this problem early in January, instead, there were at least two months of  little activity. The only thing Trump did early, was to stop travel from China. If he had worked with experts, they would have discovered that travel from Europe was much more dangerous. Initially, New York was under very serious attack.

An effective US leader would have encouraged research and organized necessary supplies. We could have developed very effective methods, and we could have helped other countries in their use. It seems that Trump does not understand that helping others will also help the US.

IGNORING THE DANGERS.  From January 2020 to present (September) Trump has mostly minimized the dangers; presumably to make himself look better for the upcoming election. Journalist Bob Woodward presented to the public, tape recordings of his interviews with Trump. The recordings showed that he was very aware of the virus dangers, but “downplayed” them to avoid “panic.” An experienced leader would have concluded that it was much more important for the public to take the threat seriously, than to be concerned about panic. Trump stated numerous times that the virus will simply “disappear,” without any authoritative justification for this conclusion. He spoke of the development of a “herd mentality.” He actually meant “herd immunity,” which occurs when a high percentage of the population can no longer be infected.  Most experts believe that to quickly achieve herd immunity would result in too many deaths and so would be unacceptable.

FAILURE TO SUPPORT MASK USE AND DISTANCING.  With only a few exceptions, Trump has discouraged the use of face masks, social distancing, and avoidance of crowds. For a while, he was chiding people that wore masks. A responsible president would know that leadership and setting a good example is expected. Yet, for a long time, Trump would never wear a mask and often was too close to others. But what was more egregious, he held several large rallies where most were without masks, and people were crowded together.  Note that the Woodward tape recordings showed that Trump was aware of the airborne spread of this virus.

FAILURE TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT.  Fighting a virus like covid involves the manufacture of massive amounts of equipment, including: advanced masks, hospital gowns, ventilators, etc. Trump refused to use the Defense Production Act, which could have forced the production of essential items. He could have organized the production of supplies, but instead said that governors would have to be responsible. It was several months before adequate equipment, such as PPE (personal protective equipment) was available. Meanwhile, doctors and nurses were being infected. 

RUSHING THE VACCINE.  Trump has often been in conflict with his medical experts, such as Anthony Fauci, MD. The experts say that it will take several more months before a vaccine is approved and that it will be at least six more months before it is generally available. Trump wants to rush the vaccine because it will help with his election. There are several problems with rushing.  The first is that it could take considerable testing time before harmful side effects are discovered. Safety has been a primary concern after the 1961 thalidomide tragedy, in which thousands of babies had birth defects or died. The second is that if the vaccine effectiveness does not reach a certain level (ranging between 50 and 70%), it is useless — and large quantities created at great expense would have to be destroyed. A third consideration, is that with all of the controversy associated with rushing approval, many folks will simply refuse to take it.

Early in the year I noted that medical experts estimated that it would take  at least a year or a year-and-a-half before a vaccine would be available. Current population of the US is 328 million.  At the assumed two-doses per person, this would require the manufacture, bottling, storage and application of about 500 million doses (some would not need it).  It is a huge project, and such projects usually take longer than expected because there are unanticipated difficulties. Developing virus testing methods will have similar problems. 

FINAL THOUGHT.  I am guessing that it will be two or three years before the virus will be at an insignificant level. The money spent in developing and applying vaccination and virus testing for most of the population will be colossal. We spend it, in order to save many lives, a worthwhile goal.  However, I fear that much of the money will be spent unwisely and wasted. Consider that many will refuse the vaccination and the virus testing. Both the vaccination and testing may have high error rates. Many will always refuse masks, distancing and washing. 

But I have had this thought, which may be way off base. What if we spent less money on the virus and used the savings for effective research and solutions to the climate-change dilemma, which also costs many lives, and in addition, the destruction of homes and property. My feeling is that we will waste huge amounts of money related to the virus, when more lives might be saved by increasing our efforts on the climate. As the years go by, the climate will be much more of a problem than the virus.

What do you think?

 

212. Trump Corruptions of the 2020 Election

14 Sep

Trump often complains that US elections are rigged. But it appears that most of the rigging is done by Trump himself or his associates (including Russian Vladimer Putin). Here are examples of this rigging:

In speeches, Trump has made numerous statements designed to scare or discourage voters. It is the clear duty of a President to encourage voting as a part of the democratic process. He claims that mail-in (same as absentee) ballots are not safe, which could discourage some from voting. He claims that if he is not elected, the process was rigged and therefore invalid. Note that Trump himself, uses the same type of mail-in ballot that everyone else uses, and lies that his are special. He hopes that if rigging can be established, that he can stay in office. In the end, it might take the Army to get him out of the White House, but foolishly, he recently insulted the military leaders.

Trump has discouraged or ignored attempts to make US voting safer from foreign attack. Major government efforts to fight foreign influence have been ignored by Trump.

The Trump impeachment was about a corruption of funding for Ukraine, in its fight against Russia. Funds appropriated by Congress were delayed until the Ukrainian President would agree to declare an investigation of the Joe Bidens son.

Post Office: Trumps man, Postmaster General DeJoy, slowed down mail delivery, through the elimination of sorting machines, variations in scheduling, and changes in personnel. Slowdown could benefit the
President in several ways. In one way, fewer Democrat mail-in ballots would be counted. In another way, the election would never be completed and presumably Trump would stay in office longer. Postmaster DeJoy is now under investigation.

Census. He attempted to cut down the time for Census completion so that fewer poor people would be counted. This would allow more federal funds and other benefits to go to Republican areas. The Census is provided for in the US Constitution and its corruption distorts many government functions.

Attorney General Barr meddled in the prosecution and sentencing of Trump criminal staff. Trump wanted his staff to look less criminal, better for election. Commuting sentences and hinting at pardons was used to discourage testimony against him.

Attorney General Barr undermined the Mueller Report by misrepresenting its conclusions. Barr stated incorrectly that there was a complete exoneration of the President, making him look better for re-election. Note that the investigative work of Mueller was limited to certain safer subjects and that Trump never gave actual testimony.

Intelligence Agencies. He forced the modification of intelligence reports to obscure Russian election interference. A whistleblower claimed that reports needed to change to be consistent with his policies.

CDC and Medical experts: Trump minimized the dangers of the virus. See Woodward’s voice tapes in which he confessed to downplaying the virus to prevent “panic.” But obviously it is not about panic, which he promotes in many other ways.* Virus deaths reflect poorly on his time in office and would harm his election success. He has downplayed the virus from its onset to today. It is reported that Trump associates have pressured scientists to alter reports so as to support his election needs

In many instances, scientists have been pressured or fired in an effort to improve Trumps election chances. For example, a report on climate-change would be altered to indicate less danger.

The use of the White House as a GOP convention backdrop is a violation of tradition and may violate laws (like the Hatch Act). The White House is supposed to be used for government purposes and not for any political functions. There are numerous violations in this area.


*Examples of Trump promoting panic: He tried to scare suburban people with the possibility that low-grade housing would be built in their neighborhoods; which only he could prevent. He tried to scare people by emphasizing violence, riots, and destruction of property. He falsely claimed that Democrats were responsible for the riots and that only he could prevent riots.