11 The “Private Sector” Solution

10 May

There are two points I want to make in this essay: 1. Experience in the private sector is not appropriate for a president, and 2. Shifting major governmental responsibility to the private sector is dangerous.

1. Experience in private sector

Businessmen like Mitt Romney often say that we should run the country like a business. But the end goal for most businessmen is to make as much money as possible up to the point of risking arrest. The bottom line is the acquisition of personal wealth, and if necessary, paying dividends to stock holders. In business, there is little concern for the health and welfare of the workers. To increase profits, workers are paid just enough to keep them productive, or to satisfy union demands. Note that not all businesses are ruthless, but looking at Romney’s business record, it appears that his personal wealth was more important than company success or worker welfare.

What does a businessman actually learn aside from the specifics of an actual organization. He learns trivial things, like if income exceeds expenses you make a profit. If you pay your executives well, they will be loyal to you. Paying your workers less will increase your profits. If a company is doing poorly, then give youself a huge salary (or bonus) and let the company go bankrupt. A good businessman does well whether the company succeeds or fails. Governing a country is different.

Governments could run like businesses, but if you ask most people, our leaders should be concerned with the strength and welfare of the country, and the health and economic success of all its citizens. We don’t elect our leaders so that they can increase their peronal wealth, or the wealth of their friends. A president must maintain an army and police to protect us, educational institutions, efficient energy production, ethical industries, transportation, budgets, and other governmental factors. Budgets are extremely important and must maintain a balance between lowering national debt and supporting the needs of citizens.

If a leader has spent much of his life in the private sector, he sees and particpates in a society where money is king. People compete and show off their wealth. Romney cannot hide this orientation. He talks about his car elevators, his wife who has a couple of Cadilacs, how he knows the owners of teams, etc. Romney is not oriented to provide for the citizens, he lives in a world where wealth is almost everything. We don’t want his experiences and orientation, we want a president that cares about his country’s citizens.

2. Shifting to the Private Sector.

The theory is that competition among businesses always leads to lower prices and more efficiency. Sadly, this is not the case. Governments are not perfect, but there is more emphasis on constructive and beneficial work than on the accumulation of personal wealth.

Though out history, the private sector has learned to circumvent competition to increase profits, and to develop practices that are highly profitable, but unethical. Industrial laws and regulations were not developed without cause. Laws and regulations are based on serious abuses. Governments need industry, but there is recognition of a need to control it. One of the earliest attempts to control industry greed was the establishment of anti-trust laws. Businesses were working together to fix higher prices.

The Sherman Act of 1890 was the first anti-trust law and covered the fixing of prices by competitors. The Clayton act of 1914 prevented mergers of companies which would tend to stifle competition. U.S. Steel and Standard Oil controlled entire industries and prices rose dramatically. There were additional laws after these fundamental acts. My point is that even a hundred years ago business leaders saw an advantage in joining forces and stifling competition.

A great variety of regulations followed, which were necessary to protect consumers. In their obsession to create personal wealth, private sector persons ignored air polution, contamination of drinking water, tainted foods and drugs, etc. It is very common for people to drift into unethical practices as they compete to be the wealthiest guy around.

I have one more comment on Romney. He tends to turn everything around so that it appears that he and his Republican friends are the good people. He complains that government workers make more than industry workers. It is much more the other way around. Studies of regulators hired by Republicans earn much less (and perform worse) than their industry counterparts. He also makes the absurd claim that Democrats have a war on women, when it is clearly the Republicans.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: