Tag Archives: AOC

157. Current Issues, Briefly, #3

29 Mar
This is the third of a series of blogs with brief discussions of current issues. The material is based on my Tweets, unpublished thoughts, and descriptions of various publications that I feel are worth repeating and emphasizing.
.
AOC wants a “Green New Deal,” Trump wants a “Greed New Deal”
.
Here is a recent comment I wrote about Clinton, Lewinsky, and special reports
I like both exPres. Clinton and Hillary (who would have made a great president). Both fine people.  Powerful articulate leaders like Bill Clinton at their peak are constantly approached by women who want an intimate connection.  I don’t blame anyone in the Lewinsky affair. It is just natural and many good leaders indulge.  Hillary was great for her understanding and loyalty.  Angry Republicans and eager reporters made a mountain out of a mole hill. Re the Mueller Report, wait and see what it really says. As the investigation progressed, it became more and more corrupted by Trump and it looks like Mueller decided to finish early. But he and others will actually continue for quite a while.  Additional note: What a president does as president, should not be affected by personal matters, like affairs. 
.
Latest: Trump says the Republican party will be “the party of health care.” Really? The Dems developed a plan with numerous benefits for all citizens and has been in effect for many years. Millions of additional folks were covered. ObamaCare, which could have had a better record, was sabotaged by the Repubs.  The Republican party has never agreed on a final health care plan in the form of a Congressional bill. They have only had several competing ideas. Clearly, Trump would end ObamaCare without replacement as he promised over and over. If that happened, literally many millions of people would greatly suffer and many would have died (estimated 25,000 dead per year). He does not care about us, he only cares about destroying the Obama legacy, proving his superiority, and supporting his rich friends with tax cuts and subsidies.
.
Today,  Adam Schiff, Chair of the House Intelligence Committee was attacked by Repub members and asked to resign because he investigates Trump.  Schiff made an excellent reply citing various well-known events, such as the Trump Tower meeting (June 9, 2016) including Trump family members and a Russian agent. Schiff has a calm intelligent confidence that should be an example for us all. Send him a nice letter or donation.
.
As I watch Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (akaAOC) in action, she is very impressive. As she gains more experience, she will be an even more powerful force for the right causes. She is very likable and persuasive.
.
Mueller could have continued his investigation but decided to quit early.  He could see that Congressional and State probes would now be more effective. His investigation was taken over by those being investigated. The Democrat House committees, SDNY (district court), and other agencies will get more answers.
.
Trump touts his election win and basically says Mueller is a nothing because he was not elected. Really? More people voted for Hillary than Trump. When Republican Robert Mueller was chosen as Special Council, Repubs like William Barr (now AG) were highly pleased. Special Councils are never elected. Mueller was FBI director for 12 years and was a medaled Marine. Mueller was not elected, Trump argues, but are all elected people good citizens?
.
Regarding the UK Brexit, the real message of the Theresa May plan rejections, is that what the Parliament really wants is another vote. After recent experiences, more people may be changing their minds. Personally, I would like to see the UK rejoin the EU. The EU is a powerful force for good in the world, and pre-Trump, a highly valued friend of the USA.
.
Mitch McConnell prematurely brought the “Green New Deal” to a vote before any discussion. Dem senators voted “present” as a way of showing their contempt for this trickery.  The Green New Deal, AOC said, was meant to be a “vision document” and not an actual bill. I generally like the plan, but much of it is for the distant future and provokes ridicule. It would be better to have a more acceptable plan for an actual bill and have more controversial ideas as a platform or something else. “Visions” are great, but they must not interfere with voting down Trump and his Greed New Deal.
.

151. Trump: I Did It My Way

2 Mar

If you have had much contact with teenagers, you notice that the brighter ones often learn a little about something and think they are now experts. They will explain how you are wrong and they are correct. But I have found that most of the time the older wise person has the best answer. Often, the teenager will not consider all of the possible results of a new approach.

I want to talk mostly about Trump, but I will start with a Democrat issue. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) is an intelligent and dedicated young person who is promoting the “Green New Deal.” (I totally agree with her “dreams”). I received an email asking if I believe in Climate Change, and would I endorse the Green New Deal. I hesitated because it became clear that this new deal covered much more than Climate Change. The email was misleading; there should have been an option for agreeing with most of it. I did not endorse it because some of the deal included ideas that were so far left that some voters would be turned off. Since beating Trump is paramount, the deal should state good progressive goals, but not include specific features that go too far. AOC should have discussed this deal with older more experienced politicians.  Nancy Pelosi is hesitating to endorse the Green New Deal. Pelosi is a well-proven political genius and AOC should consult with her, along with others.

There are many examples of Trump errors due to his inexperience. In negotiating a treaty Trump’s procedure is to have secret one-on-one meetings with the foreign leader. This is very different from the established USA method of interaction. traditionally, the Secretary of State and foreign equivalent work out the details and then the leaders get together for finalizing. The current meeting with Kim Jong-un of N. Korea illustrates the advantage of the usual method. Trump’s trip to the Vietnam summit was a waste of time since there was no deal. And Trump is left with a serious failure. It only enhanced the status of Kim.  A complex deal requires a lot of negotiating time and should be left to experienced experts. Furthermore, the secret meetings of our President with foreign leaders leads to distrust  here in the USA and in other countries that would be affected. The secrecy makes one suspicious of illicit private deals.

Another good example of doing it his way, is in international trade deals. Traditionally, trade deals result from the combined efforts of many USA experts and representatives from relevant foreign countries. Trump does not have the capacity to predict all of the effects of a complicated deal. That is a major reason why the traditional method is better. Trump’s bad plans have produced job layoffs, closing of companies, and loss of USA leadership. China and other countries will be able to takeover more leadership roles in trade that have belonged to the USA for many years.

Briefly, here are some other areas where traditional methods employing many experts would have led to better results: organizing military troop deployments, setting up border regulations and procedures, filling of various staff and judicial positions, establishing policies based on the conclusions of our intelligence agencies,  and developing the best possible government budget that benefits the USA citizens (not just the wealthy few).

The traditional methods of USA gov were developed based upon decades of experience and trial-and-error. Sometimes there is justification for developing a new method, particularly when new technology is relevant. But in most cases, methods based on many years of experience will work best. Trump is using methods that were tried and had failed, 50 or a 100 years ago. Please see my many “BasicCauses” blogs for additional discussions of these issues.