Tag Archives: media lies


18 Apr

In my last blog, I promised to discuss solutions to the problem of “Self-Defeating Votes.” Everyone knows that this is a very difficult task, but I wanted to write down some thoughts, at least to see for myself, what I can come up with. And even if I do not change the world, maybe I can stimulate others to generate better ideas.

What I can say is that if we do get solutions, they will likely come slowly,and with considerable effort. What I am going to present is basic and would be applicable to any party affiliation. However, I will state that what I present does reflect a political preference for Democrats, as I believe that they are much more likely to improve the country for all, and particularly for the life of non-rich people.

A general method for voter improvement is simply to repeatedly emphasize in all types of communication, the basic problems and the development of rigid beliefs. I am going to address each topic previously presented in my Post 6.

Politician and media lies, distortions and omissions

The first rule is that more liberal and intelligent politicians must be scrupulously honest, to keep their credibility. Then they must carefully lay out their arguements and proofs. Mostly what we hear from politicians is inspiring talk and little about actual plans and details. Probably because that is what gets a lot of votes. Maybe what we need is both. Let the politicians inspire us, but they should also set up web sites, pamphlets, and TV presentations that are very clear, logical, and well-organized. That way, they can cover both avenues, the more intellectual and the more emotional.

Many of us, including myself, learn more from visual presentations. Visual outlines of important points stick with me and I can learn more. So I think we need to add visual, logical methods to the usual inspiring speech approach.

Failure to investigate and find truth

I am going to present a strategy using the example: The Republican Paul Ryan Budget Plan. Democrats want to discredit this plan but what often happens is that each side makes statements about it and each side claims the other is lying. Democrats need to provide an easy method of downloading this budget, and then refer to this document in their criticizms, and add excerpts so that people can verify what is included. That way people can see that they are telling the truth. Of course, this will only work for a fraction of the population, since the rest would not make the effort or would not understand the wording. Still, it would be a help, and more authoritative people could work with others.

In the course of writing this blog, I searched for an hour and could not find a copy of the complete Ryan budget. At one time, I also searched for the complete Herman Cain 9-9-9 plan. My search ended up with some computer programs, which were supposed to contain the budget. These programs were impossible to understand. One thing I do understand is that these documents tend to be hidden because a real examination would be a disaster. The current system is designed for corruption.

One solution would be to divide a large topic like healthcare into several smaller parts, each part would be passed separately and in a certain sequence. This would make discussion easier, but would only be possible in situations where each part could stand alone. Another would be to develop summaries of legislative alternatives. Democrats could develop a five page summary of the Ryan budget, and challenge Ryan to make a similar summary. If there are two summaries, then it will be easier to compare the two and discrepancies could better be resolved. If Ryan refused, then he could be criticized for that.

It seems that we only develop debates between cadidates. Maybe we need to also organize formal public debates around important pieces of legislation. Prior to the debate, each side would record its written summary of the bill on the internet. Maybe there should be a law that requires an internet bill summary to accompany any proposed bill. Perhaps, for every 20 pages of bill there should be a one page summary (or similar rule).

Pride and social pressure

These are powerful forces that profoundly influence behavior. People proudly declare that they are Conservative or that they support minorities or poor people. And they declare their affiliations to similarly minded folk and get a strong rewards for this. These identifications tend to remain powerful even if their party or group has changed its nature or goals. In my view, the Republican party has changed so much from 40 years ago, that many would leave it, except for these powerfull identification and social forces.

Most of the things that Democrats do, would be helpful in affecting moderately leaning conservatives, but maybe we need more emphasis on party changes. Many ordinary Republican voters are happy with a centrist position and just need more clarifying speeches on the powerful negative influence of Tea Party people.

Final Thought

In general, I would like to see more real arguments that get to the heart of issues. Changing minds is always difficult, but I am sure it is true that as more and more people stand up and declare what is right, we will move towards better government.

6. Self-Defeating Votes

9 Apr

It is my view and the view of many others, that many citizens vote in a way that is self-defeating.  They vote politicians into office that will legislate to their disadvantage. Non-rich people often vote for candidates that will raise their taxes and lower taxes for the very rich — causing economic hardship and a decrease in public services, like:  Medicare, social security, public safety, education, air, water, and food inspection, etc.

What are the “basic causes” for this voter “error”?   Here are some factors:

1. Politician and media lies, distortions, and omissions.

Politicians have learned to alter information in a way that is appealing to many people. They disguise their economic goals with phrases like “free enterprise”, “freedom”, “big government”, “government control”, “deregulation”, “job creators”, “hate business”, etc.  They also switch the topic to moral factors, to misdirect people from the important budget matters. (Moral principles are important, but legislators can do little in this area — and note that many conservatives have had affairs, divorces, and various shady practices.)
The politicians and media are supported by wealthy people, who can produce persuasive advertisements.  The lies are pointed out by the opposing party, but in the end, because of factors discussed below, there is little effect.  Each side says that the other is lying and some people cannot determine who is right.

2. Failure to investigate and find truth.

Many people do not know how to perform the searches that will lead to the truth.  Having a wealth of  information on the internet should make this easy, but not in many cases. And, others don’t the have the time or motivation to research. They are happy with what they believe in and only listen to those with views similar to their beliefs.   I will talk more about this in the future, but I want to list some areas where truth is found, but often overlooked:

An actual look at national budgets written by party leaders (not just the promotional lies) or at least    listen to what the opponents say.

Signed pledges (!) not to: increase taxes,  fill tax loopholes, or cancel subsidies.  (How many ordinary people can use tax loopholes or get corporate subsidies?)

False claims like: give more money to “job creators” so that it will trickle down.  The very wealthy have been trickling down on us for way too long!  Currently, “job creators” have more money than ever before. And remember that most of the so-called “job creators” are simply rich, and do not actually do any hiring.  It is better to directly reward actual job hiring,  than to throw more support to all rich people.

Remember that anti-trust legislation was developed not because of a whim, but because private businesses were greedy, and did communicate, and did stifle competition to vastly increase profits!  Not all businesses are unethical, but many are simply consumed with increasing profits in any possible way.

3. Pride and Social pressure

Social pressure from family and friends provides a powerful influence on many voters.  Those that stray lose support and friendship. Many are simply convinced by traits like “conservative”.  Someone who is fearful decides to become a conservative because it seems safer.  Once a person has made that choice, he is often trapped, because any contrary arguments bring back the fear. I have a very conservative and fearful friend who becomes visibly uncomfortable when presented with alternative ideas.

Another factor is pride. For example, an uneducated person that has worked for a corporation as a lower level manager and achieved some success takes pride in his loyalty and achievements. He is a good soldier. Once he strongly identifies with big business and corporations he ignores other considerations because they lead to internal conflict.

My next post (7th) will be concerned with the difficult job of melting hardened minds.