Tag Archives: politics

143. Trump: Why Investigate Me?

8 Feb

Trump and his staff have been extensively investigated by government agencies.
He asks why Democrat leaders are not under similar investigation? First of all, Dems. like Hillary C. HAVE suffered numerous (phony) Republican investigations. But the main point is that Trump and staff have done many suspicious things, while the Democrats have not. In my previous blogs (no.136 and others) I have detailed many questionable activities. Here is a brief (partial) list of acts that have raised suspicions.

There is unusual secrecy with respect to the public and he even keeps secrets from his closest staff. Meetings with leaders of Russia, North Korea and other countries have been totally secret. Trump does not understand that he was elected President of a Democracy and not elected to be King. He is supposed to serve the people and the people must be able to monitor (with a few limits) his actions.

Trump has not released any recent tax returns. Every president before him has done this.

Trump has favored Russia and Putin in many ways. He has discouraged Russian sanctions and delayed implementing some. Trump has stated many times how he wants to develop a close relationship with Russia — even though Russians kill reporters and attack foreign countries, like Ukraine.

He rejects information from our intelligence agencies and often favors Putin’s version of events.

Numerous Trump associates have had excessive interactions with Russians. Some have been indicted, some pleaded guilty, and some were convicted.

On TV, Trump asked Russians to reveal info on Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Trump has attacked NATO and our strongest allies. This is exactly what Putin has wanted, which is to weaken his adversaries.

Trump has often rejected the idea that Putin interfered with our elections, even though all of our intelligence agencies agree on this and assert that helping Trump was the aim. Putin himself, said that he favored Trump.

There is some evidence that Russians have provided financial benefits to Trump and his family. For example, reporters have found that condos were sold at a price much higher than market.

Trump has failed to fully separate himself (divest) from his many businesses.

In many situations Trump has defended actions of foreign countries, ignoring negative info from our intelligence agencies.

Last but not least, Trump has told thousands of lies in recent years. That in itself is highly suspicious. Even worse are the many lies by him and staff about meetings with Russians. Meetings might be OK, but frequent lying about them is very suspicious.

Advertisements

142. Trump Nullification

31 Jan

All Democrats, many Republicans, and most citizens would like to terminate Trump‘s Presidency. Most established ways are too dificult or will take too long. Here are the possibilities.

Impeachment:  The House develops a set of articles and the Senate votes on conviction. This is not likely right now, since Repubs control the Senate.

25th Amendment.  The Vice President and cabinet members can determine that the President is unfit to serve, usually because of a physical problem. The 25th Amendment to the Constitution is applicable. This is also unlikely to implement because the sycophants in these positions are blind loyalists.

Hope for Resignation.  This is possible, but not likely given Trump’s goals.

Nullification This is possible and already somewhat in effect. Trump would stay in office, but Congress and his staff would create barriers so that he would lose most of his control. He could still do ceremonial and minor actions, but all major decisions would be made by others. An example is the bi-partisan committee that is dealing with southern border security. The committee is made up of Repub and Dem Congressmen. Trump is not invited to this process. He could veto any resulting legislation, but hopefully an override could provide passage. Trump’s hostage (or leverage) approach using a gov shut-down as a threat would not be possible under this nullification process. The hostage method of Trump is un-American and un-Constitutional.

In all other areas Congress or possibly other agencies like the CIA, DOJ, Military, etc. could in various ways, nullify Trump’s irresponsible “tweety” decisions. In the past there has been nullification, like removing papers from his desk, and simply delaying orders, which are eventually forgotten. What is also happening, is that leaders like USA Sec. of State have assured foreign leaders of USA alliance.

Trump’s lies and mistakes are increasing so that the nullification will be more and more necessary. At the same time, the Dems. must find the best possible candidate to defeat Trump in the next election.

 

140. Shut-Down Reveals Motives

25 Jan

The government shut-down, resulting from failure to pass a spending bill, is a national tragedy.  Many government workers and gov projects are severely affected by the lack of wages paid and other various non-funding. I sometimes suspect that this serious problem is Trump’s revenge for the investigations.  An interesting result of this conflict is that the negotiations and numerous related comments have revealed hidden motives and strategies. (Maybe not so hidden, for many analysts.)

I am sure that many Trump supporters are living paycheck-to-paycheck. These devotees must be shocked by the lack of concern about gov shut-down employee, that have unpaid wages.  While most employees will eventually be reimbursed, regular contractors may not receive anything. Here are some comments. Trump says that these people will “adjust,” they can always find a way. Really? His daughter-in-law Lara says that they will only feel “a little pain.” Sec. of Commerce Wilber Ross says they can get a loan. The Trump family and administration is mostly composed of hugely rich people. Does it sound like they have any appreciation for the results of lost wages ??

When Trump terminated the DACA law, he said that Congress can restore it. This sounded puzzling to me. Now I understand. DACA was terminated so that it could be used for future leverage  negotiations, and it just has been. Obviously, Trump does not care about these people (mostly good tax-paying people) at all, they are just pawns in his schemes. For Trump, everyone is a pawn except for his super-rich buddies, family, and a few of associates.

The way that Congressmen vote on various “shut-down” bills tells you a lot about their character.

Nancy Pelosi has been very adamant about not supporting any money at all for the wall. I have thought about this a lot and today I think I better understand her strategy. My initial thought, and what others have said, is that it like NOT negotiating with terrorists, because more people will get kidnaped if it is rewarded. So don’t give in to Trump to avoid future leverages. But there may be an additional factor. Instead of moving on impeachment, which is chancy, she wants to stop Trump by giving him a major defeat. Losing the shut-down battle may inhibit him from doing other worse things. Continuing the shut-down is harmful, but may less so that an unchecked Trump.

The USA, our lovely homeland, is caught up in traps that have possible remedies, but the remedies will only be achieved with a great concerted effort. Some damage, like radical conservative judges at every level. will be relatively permanent. The current administration has reversed climate-change efforts. Lack of worldwide climate efforts is already causing hurricane and flooding catastrophes, and will ultimately cause the death of many more people. My last word is to thank the many politicians and citizens that have good will and are working on our many problems.

 

 

 

 

139. In the USA, A Growing Autocracy

23 Jan

We are now in the early stages of a growing autocracy with Donald Trump as the aspiring dictator. An “autocracy” is a government in which one person (like a president) controls all of the major decisions. And typically, all dissenters are nullified in some way  and in the worst case murdered.

In our country, the USA, there are clear trends in this direction. Note particularly, the long government shut-down imposed by Trump in order to promote the southern border wall foolishly promised in his campagne. In the traditional way of tyrants he falsely created a border crisis and justified his use of gov employee hostages to coerce congressional action. He even admitted that he could see a shut-down for a year. And there is no sympathy for employees missing paychecks; “they will adjust.” (Trump’s concept of adjustment is getting millions from his father.) Democrats are reluctant to negotiate because on numerous occasions, Trump simply changed his mind after an agreement was reached. Here is a list of other indications of autocracy.

The press is an enemy of him and the people. He justifies Putin killing off dissenting reporters by saying that the US gov also kills people. Leaders that

He has expressed admiration for various tyrants. He is impressed by their ability to control the citizens. How can anyone accept this kind of thinking — but Republican leaders do??

He is the leader of a corrupt political party that follows him with slavish devotion. Early on, many Repubs were against him, but they ALL caved in as his popularity grew.

He undermines and diminishes our most important government institutions, such as the FBI, other intelligence agencies, and many executive agencies such as the State Department. He leads by whims, disregarding knowledgable experts.

His method of negotiation is usually by the use coercion. He bullies our allies and attempts to destroy NATO — likely to please his friend Putin.  On several occasions he has threatened to leave NATO.

Another common characteristic of a tyrant is rule by family. No one really likes a tyrant so nepotism provides safety for him. His daughter and particularly her husband have held important positions.

Testimony has indicated that he has demanded absolute loyalty from members of his administration, for example, FBI director Comey.

Objective evaluations indicate that Trump has told thousands of lies or major exaggerations. Tyrants are known for this and the re-writing history.

He has viciously attacked political adversaries, like Hillary Clinton. He leads the chorus in “lock-her-up.”

He is a ruthless autocrat in dealing with his staff, political rivals, and vulnerable people like those from Central America seeking asylum in our country. He will fire someone using a tweet, without any warning. His plan to stop immigration from the south, is to separate children from their parents. And his plan was so poorly implemented that hundreds still have not been re-united.

By major lowering of taxes for very rich people he gathered donor support.

Tyrants often have scapegoats that are blamed for all problems. For Trump it is Mexicans and Muslims.

      How can people not see this growing dictatorship?

All of the features of tyranny described above are indicators of a serious trend.  We must stop this man using any possible legal method. The further he gets in forming this autocracy, the more difficult it will be to end. The one hopeful aspect of this is that Trump is pretty old and likely will become more and more demented and unable to perform the tasks of his office.

 

 

 

 

 

136. Trump & Putin, Just Infatuation?

13 Jan

If you don’t know that Trump has excessively supported Russia and Putin then you must have been in a 4-year coma. The NY Times just reported that the FBI has been investigating this inappropriate relationship since the firing of FBI Dir. Comey. For those who need some reminders, here is a list of relevant information. One or two factors might not be significant, but so many interactions (many with secrecy) with one country is very suspect.

Failure to condemn Russian attacks on Ukraine and the take-over of Crimea.

Failure to believe his own intelligence agencies, that it was Russia that interfered with the US elections.

Significant delays in implementing some Russian sanctions.

Failure to agree (in a timely fashion) that Russia was responsible for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in England. Months later, after congressional pressure, he finally acted.

Several meetings with Russian leaders and Putin himself without publishing any details. He confiscated translators notes and swore the translator to secrecy. There usually was no sharing of info with his team, and often Trump associates were not present in the meeting room.

Putin’s policies with regard to Afghanistan and other topics were parroted by Trump, and are generally considered lies. Putin claimed that terrorists from Afghanistan attacked Russia, and that led to the Russian attack.

Numerous Trump associates have had excessive interactions with Russians. Some have been indicted, some pleaded guilty, and some were convicted.

On TV, Trump asked Russians to reveal info on Hillary Clinton’s emails.

There is evidence that Trump was planning a hotel in Moscow and was communicating with Putin about this.

Trump implemented to some extent, Putin’s goals of breaking breaking up NATO, which has protected us and Europe from Russian invasion.

In the Helsinki meeting, Trump believed Putin over his own intelligence agencies, and showed an unusual amount of friendship.

Numerous statements on TV that the US must have a good friendship with Russia, even though they interfered with our elections and attacked Ukraine.

Donald Trump Jr. stated that Russians had financially supported the Trump family, when US banks rejected him.

Many of Trump’s foreign trade and military policies have provided opportunities for Russia to take more leadership roles.

There is evidence that Russians have provided income for Trump by paying excessive prices when buying his condos.

134. My View of 2020 Gov

12 Jan

Please see my previous blog for a list of the most popular Democrat presidential candidates. I rated Elizabeth Warren as my top choice for President. Since I wrote blog #133, I still rate her tops, but feel more positive about Kamala Harris. Warren has a unique combination of strength, inspirational leadership, intelligence, and social skills. I think she would be able to gather the best consultants and utilize their knowledge.      Kamala is also impressive in these factors and maybe her time will be 2024.  Here is a possible view of a 2020 gov:

President: Eliz Warren,   Vice Presidentt: Eric Swalwell.  I think a female-male combination would be a good balance.  Eric has great voter appeal and appears capable.

Kamala Harris should have a prominent position, perhaps Sec of State, or chief of staff.

Top cabinet positions could be filed with Beto, Joe Kennedy, and other capable young candidates, where they could be effective. In many cases, such positions should be filled by outstanding professors, gov agency officials, and other well-established experts in special fields. Any position where science is important, should be filled with appropriate scientists (or similar), not political allies.

I would expect that Elizabeth would have regular consultations with Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry.  Al Gore and Jay Inslee could help with climate-change issues. Imagine a president that consults with really good people. Under Obama, this was the rule.

Traditional government agencies should be immediately restored with the best personnel. Hopefully, there could be many judicial appointments with progressive orientations. I assume that Pres. Warren would rely heavily on experts in foreign policy, military matters, environmental factors, scientific and health applications/research, correcting income inequality, taxation, infrastructure improvement, education, and many other areas. It is exciting to anticipate this governmental revision.  Many other good configurations are possible, and I look forward to a Democrat victory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

133. The Age of Candidates

3 Jan

Below is a list of 2020 Presidential Democrat Candidates with their age and highest office.  I am older than all of these candidates so I know how important age is in being able to function in this demanding environment. The older candidates may have diminished memory and intellectual functioning.  (Trump likely suffers from Alzheimer’s disease, which could account for his bizarre behavior.)

My list below includes all those with at least some national name recognition. All things considered, Elizabeth Warren, at this time, appears to be the best candidate. Several people listed immediately below her name could be her running mate,  and future presidential candidates.

Eliz. Warren’s age of 69 is marginal, but she likely could have four good years, and is a top choice, for sincerity and standing up to Trump. She is powerful and an excellent speaker. She has been known for solid ideals and would support the middle class, which the Repubs have ignored. She really would drain Trump’s swamp.  It’s also possible that any of the few at the top of the list could emerge in a year as the ultimate candidate.

I think Eric Swalwell  at 37 is very promising. Great charisma and looks presidential. But right now, a little too young for the top spot, but could be veep. In a few years, Joe Kennedy could gain popularity, but right now is not a great orator. I just added Jay Inslee because he is devoted to environmental and climate factors, seems well-organized, and is a good speaker. Beto O’Rourke might be a good running mate for E. Warren. I have just added (on Jan. 29) Senator Sherrod Brown to my list of good candidates. He has many years of elected public service, looks presidential, and has an appealing sensible manor.

Elizabeth Warren 69 Powerful inspirational, intelligent, now best choice

Beto O’Rourke 46 Rep. Very popular, but lacks experience

Kamala Harris 54 Senator, aggressive outspoken, maybe 2024 election

Eric Swalwell 37 Rep. Very charismatic, looks presidential speaks well

Jay Inslee 67 Gov. Washington St. Emphasizes Climate Change

Tom Steyer 61 wealthy, impeach advocate

Cory Booker 49 Senator aggressive, good speaker

Sherrod Brown 66 Senator, held political offices since 1974

Kirsten Gillibrand 51 too radical a feminist for my taste

Tim Kaine 60 Senator, OK, but not exciting

Amy Klobuchar 58 Senator, Centrist, likeable not powerful

Joe Kennedy 38 Rep. Not a great speaker, has the Name, future?

Andrew Cuomo 60 Gov NY

Terry McAuliffe 61 Gov Va, DNC chair Bill & Hillary supporter

***** Great people, but too old or otherwise past their time:

Bernie Sanders 77 Great ideals, very popular, but now too old

Michael Bloomberg 76 Mayor NY alternated parties

Joe Biden 75 ex Veep Well known and very likeable.

John Kerry 74 presidential nominee

Hillary Clinton 71 won pop. vote, would have been great pres.